Missed defense
Dealer: E Vul: All |
North | ||||
♠ | J9873 | ||||
♥ | A82 | ||||
♦ | AJ64 | ||||
♣ | 4 | ||||
West | East | ||||
♠ | AQ542 | ♠ | K | ||
♥ | Q9 | ♥ | JT64 | ||
♦ | T8 | ♦ | K732 | ||
♣ | 9865 | ♣ | JT73 | ||
South | |||||
♠ | T6 | ||||
♥ | K753 | ||||
♦ | Q95 | ||||
♣ | AKQ2 |
East | South | West | North |
P | 1N (15-17!) | P | 2H* |
P | 2S | P | 3N |
P | P | P |
Defending against my pushy 3NT at the Edgar Kaplan Winter regional, my opponent missed the precise defense to beat me. A heart would have done the trick, but who can fault the actual opening club lead? I won and played on spades, and East won and again, a heart would have done it, but he continued clubs (again, who wouldn’t?).
I won, pitching a diamond from dummy, and continued spades. West won and now had to continue clubs. I won (pitching a heart) and decided that with West long in both clubs and spades, East probably had the diamond King. Therefore the contract could be beat, but I would make it hard. I crossed to dummy in hearts and cleared spades, pitching a club. West won, cashed a club, but made the fatal play of a diamond return. I won the Ace, and cashed the spade winners, squeezing East in the red-suits to claim my game.
At that crucial junction, West had to return a heart to break up the squeeze communication.
I mentioned that after two spades had been knocked out, West had to play a third club. What if instead he plays a diamond? I win the ace, and play spades pitching a heart. West wins, and now I can strip squeeze East out of the long club in order to drive the diamond King. But just as before a heart would also beat the game. Won in dummy and spades pitching a heart. Now just as before, another heart will do it by breaking the communication, but this time, only as long as East has discarded a diamond and a club, and not a heart. Otherwise I would just duck this heart to set up a long one for my 9th trick.